Skip to the log
NetProbe24

Watch entry 02 · comparison

Three scanners, one LAN, one evening

Same network, same hour, three tools. This entry records what each found, how long it took and what it is actually for — without pretending they compete on the same task.

Angry IP Scanner results table mid-sweep
The evening's baseline: Angry IP Scanner's table before export.

The honest scoreboard

Angry IPLizardSystemsEngineer's Toolset
Swept /24 in~20 s~40 s~25 s
Found devices1714 + 6 shares17 + 2 switch maps
Shows MAC vendorsyesyesyes
Share permissionsnoyespartly, via SNMP
Switch port mappingnonoyes
Pricefree, open sourcefree cap + licencecommercial

What the numbers hide

Angry IP found three addresses LizardSystems listed as offline. LizardSystems found four shares and a printer that never answered ping — one of them writable by everyone, which is the kind of finding that justifies the whole evening. The Toolset's count looks unremarkable until you notice the two port maps: which wall socket each device lives behind, something the other two cannot produce at any speed.

Verdict, short form: sweep with Angry IP, audit shares with LizardSystems, and pay for the Toolset only when you manage switches and owe people documentation.

Where each one wastes your time

Get Angry IP Scanner Get Network Scanner Get Engineer's Toolset

Method, for the record

Wired connection from the same laptop for all three runs. Fresh boot of each program, default settings except the address range. Counts are what the tools themselves reported; no attempt was made to reconcile them into a single truth, because the disagreements are the interesting part.